How we grade evidence

Every “What does it help with?” card carries a coloured badge. It tells you how sure science is — not how good the plant is.

🟢 Scientists are sure — strong evidence

Several good clinical trials in people, usually summarised in a systematic review or accepted by an official body, found the same benefit.

🟡 Scientists think so — some evidence

Human studies show a benefit, but they are small, few, or not always of high quality. More research could change the picture.

🟠 Still being studied — early evidence

Only lab (test-tube) or animal studies so far. Interesting, but we do not know yet whether it works in people.

🔵 Grandma’s wisdom — traditional use

People have used the plant this way for a long time, sometimes recognised by official bodies as “traditional use”, but it has not been proven in clinical studies.

Rules we follow

  • A badge describes the evidence for one specific use, not the plant as a whole.
  • Food amounts and supplements are different: evidence for a concentrated extract does not mean eating more of the food does the same.
  • When sources disagree, we show both views and choose the more careful badge.
  • Safety information is never downgraded because evidence is weak — a single serious report can be enough for a warning.